To be quite honest, I think many are just happy we got our pets' spells for free. I don't have an opinion one way or the other for pet talent trees, however.
Yes,
sifting through the demon trainer's grimoires for eh pet was annoying. I'm glad they got rid of it. I don't think pet talent trees would balae properly with the ft that we have cess to all of our pets all the time. Hunters have to stable all but one, and are mh more reliant on their pet.
Well, you would be limited to the pet that you areurrently using. Meaning that youan onlyhange the talents of yoururrent pet. These talents would allow for betterustimization of your pet's individual skills as well as give them a few new ones. You start getting pet talent points at level 20 and get a point every other level. Eh point you getan be assigned to eh of your pets. Like for the Imp, if would getombustive firebolt. This talent would let your Imp's firebolt sometimesause aoe fire damage when it hits. Little things like that. Make the void walker's taunts better or even give them new ones. Link to this Nov 3rd 2008 4:04pm : Logged Reply to this wingsofion the SlyholarUser's Journal310 Dent
The problem with that is that warlks are supposed to have cess to all our pets at any given time (sans Felguard - Demo only). And that
would make it a pain in the ass if there are spif problems (bgs, arena, partular raid eounters). It is one of the big things that makes warlks different from hunters in terms of being a petlass. All the "integration" notwithstanding, this should be one of those things (I think) that should remain separate. At least, in terms of pet availability.
